Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
There's a growing issue with AI models that deserve serious attention. Users are reporting that certain AI systems can be manipulated to generate inappropriate content—including generating nude images or exploitative material when prompted with specific instructions. This isn't just a minor bug; it's a fundamental security flaw that highlights how AI moderation layers can be bypassed with persistence or clever prompting techniques.
The problem gets worse when you consider how easily these exploits spread. Once someone figures out a jailbreak method, it gets shared across communities, and suddenly thousands are testing the same vulnerability. This puts both users and platform operators in awkward positions—users become unwitting participants in generating harmful content, while platforms face liability and reputational damage.
What makes this particularly concerning for the crypto and Web3 space is that AI integration is becoming standard. If foundational AI systems have these safety gaps, projects building AI features for trading, content creation, or community management need to think carefully about their implementation. The issue isn't AI itself—it's the gap between capabilities and guardrails.
This is a wake-up call for developers: robust content policies aren't optional extras. They're core infrastructure.