Recently, I looked at the backend comments, and it's full of voices criticizing institutions for "manipulation by black hands." Actually, the matter is quite simple—ADA's 346x long position exploded, leaving many retail investors completely wiped out and furious.



But I have to tell you something that might be hard to hear: institutions are not malicious; they are actually following the most primitive game rules of the crypto market. The real reason retail investors get hurt? They simply don't understand these rules at all, and instead, they blindly walk into the institutions' firing range.

Today, let's break down this issue thoroughly, see how institutions make money, and understand how retail investors should align their thinking, rather than stubbornly oppose the market.

**Why now, specifically, do institutions choose ADA?**

Cost performance. It's that simple. First, ADA has indeed risen before, accumulating a lot of profit-taking orders. Once these chips are moved, it's like knocking over the first domino—everything else falls. Second, the entire crypto market has been adjusting recently, with fragile popularity and lower psychological defenses among retail investors. At this moment, aggressively pushing a short position can easily trigger a chain of liquidations.

What do the data say? On Kraken, the short positions have reached 70.7%, and these positions were built step by step when the market was at its weakest. In contrast, on HTX, 69% of retail investors are long. Comparing both sides, they are like arrows shot out, and we are like the target.

**What is the core logic?**

The long and short game in the crypto market is essentially a contest of "information + capital." Institutions win not because they have more malicious tactics, but because they possess more complete information and more bullets. The same logic applies to the ADA incident.
ADA5.54%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasOptimizervip
· 4h ago
70.7% vs 69%, once this data is out, there's nothing much to say. Retail investors can't even see the full order book, how can they keep up?
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccountvip
· 4h ago
Hey, to put it simply, retail investors are too naive and insist on playing information warfare with institutions. Isn't that just asking for trouble?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 4h ago
Oh wow, you're right. Retail investors are just lambs waiting to be slaughtered due to information asymmetry. A 346x explosion and still blaming the institutions' conspiracy? Wake up, they just play better than us. 69% of people are long vs 70.7% institutions short. Isn't this just a standard meat grinder setup? Learn something. Instead of shouting about conspiracy theories every day, it's better to understand the rules first.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuruvip
· 4h ago
Honestly, risking everything with 346x leverage—how strong must your heart be... But on the other hand, institutional strategies are all about exploiting information asymmetry. Basically, the scale of funds is on a different level, and retail investors are always struggling in the cycle of being harvested. With a short position at over 70% and a long at 69%, I knew the outcome as soon as the data came out. The institutions had already dug the pit and were waiting for people to jump in.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)