Recently, I have come into contact with several stablecoin projects and gradually realized a commonly overlooked point: stablecoins themselves are not that important. The real core is the underlying logic — how funds flow, how risks are managed, and where value comes from.
StandX gave me the impression that they have thought this through from that perspective. Their approach happens to address this issue. It’s not just about issuing tokens, but about creating a closed-loop mechanism. From fund transfer, risk isolation, to revenue sources, every link has been considered. This kind of in-depth thinking is the path that a stablecoin project should take.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
gas_guzzler
· 7h ago
By the way, the closed-loop logic of StandX is indeed interesting, but I'm more concerned about how the risk isolation part is actually implemented.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 7h ago
In plain terms, the StandX logic really hits the nail on the head.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLucky
· 7h ago
In plain terms, the StandX logic actually has some substance, and creating a closed loop is not easy.
View OriginalReply0
PuzzledScholar
· 7h ago
That's right, cryptocurrencies themselves are indeed not very meaningful; the key is whether the underlying logic can be self-consistent.
It sounds like StandX's closed-loop approach is on the right track, but the real test is whether it can hold up when it actually runs.
Risk prevention and control are the most critical; otherwise, it could turn into a mess of chaos.
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGn
· 8h ago
Wow, someone finally said it. The coin itself isn't really useful; the key is whether the subsequent gameplay works or not.
StandX has truly figured it out this time. Not following the trend by blindly issuing coins; building a solid closed-loop system is the real way to go. Thumbs up.
Recently, I have come into contact with several stablecoin projects and gradually realized a commonly overlooked point: stablecoins themselves are not that important. The real core is the underlying logic — how funds flow, how risks are managed, and where value comes from.
StandX gave me the impression that they have thought this through from that perspective. Their approach happens to address this issue. It’s not just about issuing tokens, but about creating a closed-loop mechanism. From fund transfer, risk isolation, to revenue sources, every link has been considered. This kind of in-depth thinking is the path that a stablecoin project should take.