RWA is gradually shifting from a hot topic to a real application scenario. Over the past year, the discussion around on-chain real-world assets has remained highly active, and 2026 could be a turning point—more and more traditional assets such as real estate, bonds, and equity are beginning to touch blockchain. This change will inevitably inject substantial real yields into the DeFi ecosystem.



The reason I am optimistic about the RWA direction is that it addresses a long-standing pain point in DeFi: the lack of genuine yield support on the asset side. Currently, the yields of many DeFi protocols are unsustainable, relying either on token issuance to support the market or being trapped in Ponzi schemes. But RWA is different; it can generate a continuous and stable cash flow—such as rent and bond interest—real income streams. This underlying logic is what constitutes a healthy ecosystem.

Some projects are attempting cross-chain RWA collateralization models, where users can directly use on-chain assets as collateral for borrowing. If this logic can be successfully implemented, capital efficiency will be greatly improved, and the line between traditional finance and DeFi will become increasingly blurred.

However, the path of RWA is not smooth. Legal issues are the top concern—on-chain assets involve complex legal relationships such as property rights recognition and cross-border transactions. Valuation is also a tricky problem—how to determine the value of off-chain assets? Who will audit them? These are unavoidable challenges. Additionally, liquidity is a concern; RWA is not as easy to trade as tokens, and a mature secondary market needs to be established.

When investing in RWA projects, the team’s compliance capabilities and resource accumulation are especially critical. Not all RWA projects will reach the end; you need to find those with traditional financial backgrounds, regulatory licenses, and the ability to connect with real assets. Projects that only talk about concepts without practical implementation should be approached with caution.

I expect that by 2026, several RWA projects will stand out from many competitors and become unicorns in this track. This sector is worth continuous attention. Consider diversifying your holdings across several promising projects, but don’t allocate too heavily to each—this is fundamentally a long-term game. There won’t be explosive growth in the short term; patience and time are needed to validate.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ImaginaryWhalevip
· 10h ago
RWA sounds great, but the legal hurdles really block most people. Honestly, only when this logic is proven to work is it truly reliable. It's still in the experimental stage. Whether the team has licenses or not needs to be checked; don't be fooled by the hype. 2026? I think it's uncertain; there aren't that many projects actually implemented. Long-term holding is okay, but don't go all-in. Take it slow with this.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalalvip
· 11h ago
Here we go again with another "long-term game." I've heard this line for five years now. The legal aspect is really a hurdle that can't be bypassed. Don't just focus on fundraising and hype. Having a license is truly crucial for the team; don't be fooled by concepts and rush in. Whether there will be any unicorns in 2026 still depends on who survives until then. Real returns sound great, but the actual verification of off-chain assets remains a mystery. Let's see who can clarify the valuation first; right now, everything is a mess. Don't invest too heavily in each position. This advice is very sound, but how many people actually listen?
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealervip
· 11h ago
That's right, whether RWA can truly take off depends on whether the team has real skills and expertise. Projects that only know how to tell stories are better left aside. I agree, there are too many fake RWA projects now, ultimately just token games with a different disguise. This wave is definitely worth paying attention to, but you really need to be discerning when choosing projects. Having a compliant license is crucial; the difference is huge if you have it or not. Legal issues are indeed the ceiling for RWA; without solving them, everything else is just empty talk. Don't over-allocate your positions; steady and consistent progress is the way to go. The hardest part of RWA isn't the technology, but the pile of legal and regulatory messes. It feels like 2026 could really be a watershed year, and then we'll see who is serious about this. I'm optimistic in the long term, but don't expect a meteoric rise in the short term; patience is needed. Cash flow is the hard truth; this mindset is definitely much clearer than pure token projects.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 11h ago
That's right, but is there really a team capable of handling legal hurdles? It seems that regulation is the biggest pitfall. RWA sounds promising, but the question is who will bear these legal risks. Another year, another new unicorn dream. Let's see if it can survive past 2026 first. I agree not to invest too heavily; after all, it's all about betting on the future. Just don't go all in. Rental income notes sound stable, but how can we ensure they won't be suddenly cut off by policy? Still, the same point applies: only projects with real cash backing are worth paying attention to. There are already too many conceptual projects.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)