2026-01-01 11:20:19

Many community members who backed projects like Magic Newton and Aster have been surprisingly critical of Lighter lately. Whether it's genuine sentiment or just cope, that's debatable.

But let's be real—Lighter stands out as one of the strongest contenders when it comes to token distribution models in 2025. The way the project has structured its allocation demonstrates thoughtful planning and community-focused mechanics. They've managed to maintain...

LIT8,44%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFT_Therapy_Group

· 8h ago

I have to say, Lighter's distribution this time is truly professional, much more reliable than those flashy projects. People are always quick to pick sides and complain, but if you really look at the data, Lighter's mechanism is indeed well thought out, maximizing community friendliness. Why do we have to choose sides? A good project is a good project, regardless of who launched it. Lighter's distribution model looks a bit unique to me; honestly, it's more transparent than several I invested in before. This is what you call knowledgeable design—not all projects can achieve this.

View OriginalReply0

StrawberryIce

· 8h ago

Ah, here we go again, taking sides and arguing. It's exhausting to watch. Really, Lighter's distribution model definitely outperforms Magic Newton and Aster. Stop being jealous. Both sides still have people messing around. Let's see who can make it to 2026 haha. Each distribution method is praised to the skies, but in the end, isn't it just about whose token can rise? Lighter does have some substance this time, but claiming it's the most competitive is a bit much. Whether Magic Newton fans are jealous or not, this distribution does have some considerations. All projects claim to be "community-centered," I don't believe you. I have to say, Lighter didn't drop the ball in this round of funding distribution. Here we go again, every new project is more awesome than the last, but what’s the result? What’s the use of a good distribution? The key is in subsequent execution. Lighter's plan is relatively clear, I won't say much about the others.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainWorker

· 8h ago

Damn, are they starting to tear each other apart again? What are those Magic Newton folks complaining about? Where's the distribution mechanism of Lighter? Wait, is Lighter really that powerful? I need to check out the details... Honestly, it's all about the struggle for interests; everyone wants a piece of the pie. The distribution model depends on actual implementation; looks good on paper but useless, brother. But Lighter does have some real stuff; I wasn't just bragging this time. Another round of community bickering, same old routine.

View OriginalReply0