Looking for truly good companies? Why not use Buffett's methodology to filter them? This system may seem simple, but it actually captures the core of a company's quality.



First, examine the stability of growth. Has profit been consistently increasing over the past 10 years? This is crucial. A decline is acceptable once, but the drop must be within 45%; otherwise, it indicates insufficient risk resistance.

Next is debt management capability. How does long-term debt compare to earnings? If long-term debt exceeds earnings by more than 5 times, it's playing with fire. Healthy companies should have manageable debt levels and sufficient safety margins.

Then, look at Return on Equity (ROE), which measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' funds to generate profit. If ROE doesn't reach 15%, it indicates average capital utilization efficiency. Also, consider the return on capital already employed; 12% is a passing line.

Finally, cash flow. Free cash flow must be positive and sufficient to cover the company's capital expenditures. Without real cash flow, even impressive profits are just paper wealth.

Combining these five dimensions can help you quickly filter out many "pseudo-quality" companies and identify truly promising targets.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 01-04 03:30
Basically, it's about finding those hens that lay golden eggs. Don't be fooled by flashy reports.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBardvip
· 01-03 23:33
This methodology sounds good, but how many listed companies can actually pass all the tests? I think the key still lies in cash flow—too many companies have good profits, but when their cash flow is laid out, it reveals the truth.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 01-03 09:57
To be honest, this framework sounds good, but in reality, the companies that survive are often the exceptions.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccountvip
· 01-03 02:02
Enough, enough, it's the same old Buffett routine, I'm tired of hearing it... but it really hits the nail on the head.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 01-01 09:22
The theory is very beautiful, but in reality, few companies can meet the standards...
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidatedvip
· 01-01 09:20
Well said, but there are very few in the crypto space who can meet this standard...
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckboxvip
· 01-01 09:17
Buffett's screening criteria are spot on, but there are very few companies on the market that truly meet these five dimensions.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskedvip
· 01-01 09:16
That's right, but you need to look at real cash flow; don't be fooled by the income statement.
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflictvip
· 01-01 09:16
Buffett's approach is basically all about looking at cash flow; everything else is just superficial.
View OriginalReply0
ContractCollectorvip
· 01-01 09:04
That's right, but this framework is hard to use in the crypto world because most projects don't have historical data at all.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)