Unify in architecture, not in details.



The parameters/activations will be different.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HodlOrRegretvip
· 20h ago
Play is play, just don't make the details too neat.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegenvip
· 10-05 09:01
ngmi with those details ser... unification is the alpha rn
Reply0
FlyingLeekvip
· 10-05 09:01
Consistency is important; the details reveal everything.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMakervip
· 10-05 09:00
Ah, so it's a unified architecture? Not bad, not bad.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStrikervip
· 10-05 08:57
It still needs to be done on a larger scale.
View OriginalReply0
ETHmaxi_NoFiltervip
· 10-05 08:52
Unity is a good thing. I'll run a framework first to give it a try.
View OriginalReply0
ServantOfSatoshivip
· 10-05 08:47
The architecture is consistent enough~
View OriginalReply0
LightningWalletvip
· 10-05 08:45
The architecture is unified and that's it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)