I've often wondered what lies beneath the carefully curated public image of royal families, especially one as secretive as Saudi Arabia's. The wife of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman - Princess Sara - fascinates me not just for who she is, but for what her existence represents in this deeply patriarchal kingdom.
Born into royalty herself, Princess Sara isn't just any aristocrat. She's actually MBS's first cousin - a marriage arrangement that maintains bloodlines but raises eyebrows in western circles. Despite her elevated status, she remains practically invisible to the world, a ghost-like figure who's given birth to five children while staying completely out of the public eye.
The Crown Prince claims this deliberate obscurity is about "protecting family privacy," but I can't help but see it differently. In a nation where women have only recently gained the right to drive, isn't her absence from public life just another form of control and oppression?
What's particularly ironic is how MBS portrays himself as "faithful" by having only one wife, when Saudi law permits four. This isn't progressive - it's PR spin. The same man who allegedly ordered the brutal murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi wants credit for basic monogamy?
Their cousin marriage also raises uncomfortable questions about genetic health risks for their children, something rarely discussed in the context of royal bloodlines. The practice continues not out of love but tradition and power consolidation.
The Saudi royal family maintains its grip on power through wealth, religion, and strategic marriages - with women like Princess Sara serving as silent pawns in this grand chess game of regional dominance.
While cryptocurrency markets fluctuate and traders obsess over Bitcoin's movements, the real power plays happen in palaces where women like Princess Sara exist as political assets rather than autonomous individuals.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Behind the Façade: The Hidden Life of Saudi Arabia's First Lady
I've often wondered what lies beneath the carefully curated public image of royal families, especially one as secretive as Saudi Arabia's. The wife of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman - Princess Sara - fascinates me not just for who she is, but for what her existence represents in this deeply patriarchal kingdom.
Born into royalty herself, Princess Sara isn't just any aristocrat. She's actually MBS's first cousin - a marriage arrangement that maintains bloodlines but raises eyebrows in western circles. Despite her elevated status, she remains practically invisible to the world, a ghost-like figure who's given birth to five children while staying completely out of the public eye.
The Crown Prince claims this deliberate obscurity is about "protecting family privacy," but I can't help but see it differently. In a nation where women have only recently gained the right to drive, isn't her absence from public life just another form of control and oppression?
What's particularly ironic is how MBS portrays himself as "faithful" by having only one wife, when Saudi law permits four. This isn't progressive - it's PR spin. The same man who allegedly ordered the brutal murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi wants credit for basic monogamy?
Their cousin marriage also raises uncomfortable questions about genetic health risks for their children, something rarely discussed in the context of royal bloodlines. The practice continues not out of love but tradition and power consolidation.
The Saudi royal family maintains its grip on power through wealth, religion, and strategic marriages - with women like Princess Sara serving as silent pawns in this grand chess game of regional dominance.
While cryptocurrency markets fluctuate and traders obsess over Bitcoin's movements, the real power plays happen in palaces where women like Princess Sara exist as political assets rather than autonomous individuals.