Prosecutors respond to sentencing controversy: The severity of the crime is the key consideration.

Recently, a discussion regarding sentencing guidelines has sparked the attention of the judicial community. In court, the judge posed a pointed question to the prosecutor: "Will the proposed doubling of the sentencing guidelines lead to inconsistencies in the verdicts?" In response, the prosecution gave a clear answer.

The prosecution stated that their recommendation does not imply that any defendant will bear excessive responsibility. They further explained: "Our position is that there should not be significant differences in sentencing itself. The real distinction lies in the severity of the criminal act itself."

This response reveals the core considerations of the judicial department when dealing with sentencing issues. They emphasize that the differences in sentencing should reflect the severity of the criminal behavior, rather than simply pursuing numerical consistency. This perspective aims to ensure judicial fairness while taking into account the specific circumstances of each case.

This dialogue highlights the challenges faced by the judicial system in balancing fairness and the specifics of individual cases. It also provokes deep reflection on sentencing standards and judicial discretion.