
All blockchain assets can generally be divided into two main categories: fungible tokens (FT) and non-fungible tokens (NFT). FT are assets that have consistent value and are interchangeable, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and various on-chain governance tokens. NFT, on the other hand, are unique digital items, each with its own identification number, characteristics, and metadata.
Understanding fungible vs non-fungible tokens is not just about knowing the difference between “replaceable” and “non-replaceable”, but about understanding the fundamental logic of the entire Web3 economic structure.
The most important features of FT include the following three points:
First, fungibility. One Token is completely equivalent to another Token, which allows it to serve as a medium of exchange.
Second, divisibility. FT can be divided into smaller units, such as 0.0001 BTC.
Thirdly, high liquidity. FT can be freely traded on global exchanges, with a clear market price.
These assets constitute the financial foundation of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, serving as the basis for payments, value storage, investment, and DeFi.
NFT is a non-fungible asset, focusing on uniqueness and non-interchangeability. It can represent a piece of artwork, a virtual item, an identity credential, or even on-chain ownership.
Unlike FT, the value of NFT often comes from:
This value model is more similar to the art market and the collectibles market, rather than being consistent with the currency market.
The value of FT mainly comes from usage, network effects, market capitalization, and the macro environment; the value of NFT, on the other hand, is more derived from cultural recognition, creator value, and project popularity.
In other words, the value of FT is “financially driven”; the value of NFT is “culturally driven.” This constitutes the fundamental difference in the value systems of fungible vs non-fungible tokens.
By the end of 2025, Bitcoin’s price falls back to around $90,000, while Ethereum remains in the range of $3,190 to $3,200. Market volatility mainly stems from macro policy tightening and liquidity contraction.
In terms of the NFT market, although the overall scale has shrunk compared to 2021, core collectibles remain strong. For example, the minimum price of CryptoPunks still holds at around 28 to 30 ETH, indicating that top blue-chip NFTs have formed a stable consensus.
FT and NFT perform differently in various cycles, reflecting the layered maturity of the Web3 ecosystem.
FT and NFT have completely different market positioning. FT is a financial layer asset, similar to digital currency or equity, and can be used for trading, clearing, and payment; while NFT is a cultural and experiential asset, more akin to art collectibles or digital identity.
FT is irreplaceable in the financial economy, and NFT has its unique position in cultural communities. The two are not in competition but together form the economic foundation of Web3.
If the goal is investment growth and pursuing stability, FT is more suitable; if the goal is collection, community participation, and gaining on-chain identity symbols, NFTs are more attractive.
FT investment looks at fundamentals, liquidity, and on-chain activities; NFT investment focuses on cultural narratives, scarcity, historical significance, and community power.
Investors should make choices based on their own risk preferences, and they may also consider a combination of both assets.
Fungible Tokens and Non-Fungible Tokens are the two main lines in the Web3 world. FT provides financial momentum, while NFT provides a cultural ecosystem. Understanding fungible vs non-fungible tokens can help investors better grasp the development trends of future crypto assets and find their own opportunities in the new wave of Web3 innovation.











